Tim Burton 2015 Election Campaign Fund






Friday 25 July 2008

Carlebach v. Churchill

It's interesting to compare Churchill's masterly and deservedly quotable summary of the effects of Islam upon humans, here, with the words of the Jewish writer, A Carlebach, in Ma'ariv, October 7, 1955, words also deserving to be much more widely known; indeed, like Churchill's, requiring almost to be committed to memory by all sensible Infidels, especially those in our diplomatic corps and our defence forces.

You can see the great English soldier/ journalist, observer of 'South Asian' and Arab-African Muslim behaviour in Afghanistan, India and Sudan, and the obscure Jew, observer of Arab Muslim behaviour in and around the land of Israel, reaching precisely identical conclusions.

Carlebach wrote:

"These Arab Islamic countries do not suffer from poverty, or disease, or illiteracy, or exploitation; they only suffer from the worst of all plagues: Islam.

"Wherever Islamic psychology rules, there is the inevitable rule of despotism and criminal aggression.

‘The danger lies in Islamic psychology, which cannot integrate itself into the world of efficiency and progress, that lives in a world of illusion, perturbed by attacks of inferiority complexes and megalomania, lost in dreams of the holy sword.

‘The danger stems from the totalitarian conception of the world, the passion for murder deeply rooted in their blood, from the lack of logic, the easily inflamed brains, the boasting, and above all: the blasphemous disregard for all that is sacred to the civilized world...their reactions -- to anything -- have nothing to do with good sense.

"They are all emotion, unbalanced, instantaneous, senseless. It is always the lunatic that speaks from their throat.

"You can talk 'business' with everyone, and even with the devil. But not with Allah...This is what every grain in this country shouts. There were many great cultures here, and invaders of all kinds. All of them -- even the Crusaders -- left signs of culture and blossoming. But on the path of Islam, even the trees have died."

(He then goes on to identify Islam, Islam, Islam as the source of Arab Muslim hostility toward the Jewish state, but I won't quote that part now; what's relevant here is his ruthless diagnosis of the typical state of mind that Islam induces in human beings, and the outward fruit of that, over time - "on the path of Islam, even the trees have died".

A Carlebach and Sir Winston Churchill would, I think, have understood each other very well.

Tuesday 22 July 2008

Sudden Jihad Syndrome

This phrase describes the condition that, apparently out of the blue, afflicts Muslims - and Muslims only- of previous good character, and causes them to inflict casualties on Infidels by whatever means come to hand. It was brought to my attention by a recent event in Birmingham, where I live - link here. The phenomenon appears to be on the increase, and is well documented here.

So what conclusion is to be drawn? It is obvious to anyone with reasonable intelligence that this is not an isolated, unconnected sequence of events. One possible conclusion is that Islam predisposes Muslims to unprecedented levels of violence - in other words it creates an unprecedented community of psychopaths wherever it predominates. A more benevolent conclusion might be that it enhances the psychopathic tendencies of those adherents of the Religion of Peace (TM) who would have been predisposed to violence against Infidels in any case.

In either case it serves as a cautionary tale insofar as non-Muslims are concerned. If you offend a Muslim intentionally or otherwise, be prepared for Disproportionate Response. Normally I would be in favour of DR, especially when Israel responds to Palestinian scum-bags firing Qassam rockets into Sderot, but when Muslim scum-bags attack white middle-class Christians in Birmingham supermarket car-parks, then the gloves are definitely off.

Update: A most illuminating comment on my recent topic of Sudden Jihad Syndrome has just been received from Dr. Hector Muhammad McScooterpipe (lately of the Neasden Jihad McScooterpipes, and coincidentally a founding member of the North London Islamic Self-Criticism Association):

“Aye, it’s true, mark my words, Islam is in no short measure a cancer upon our beloved society, a plague upon the world, and a curse upon mankind that will take generations to eliminate, if nothing is done while things may yet still be done to strike this unseemly abomination from the face of the Earth and cleanse our planet from the madness and paranoia that Islam induces wherever its evil, dark, insidious and corrupting tentacles happen to alight.”

Prophetic words indeed, Dr. McScooterpipe. We will be monitoring the situation with keen interest.

Monday 14 July 2008

Life On Planet Zog

Here's an intellectual exercise for you. Imagine that you are an inhabitant of the planet Zog, five million light-years from the planet Earth.

Your civilisation has developed to the point where you have peace amongst all your citizens. There are no Jews, there are no Christians, there are no Hindus, Sikhs, Baha'is, or other religious denominations.

Everyone on planet Zog adheres to secular principles of equality, brotherhood and liberty. Freedom of speech and expression are taken for granted. Anyone can criticise anyone else for their views and opinions, and the only retribution is that you will be judged by your peers for for views and opinions.

If you want to believe that the moon is made of green cheese then so be it. Everyone else will laugh at you, of course, but they will uphold the right for your views to be expressed.

But wait!

An electronic transmission of a document has been received by the Inter-Galactic Department of How To Monumentally Screw Things Up With The Minimum Of Effort. It is entitled Koran.doc - and on examination purports to be a guide to the Universal Explanation Of Everything and What To Do Under Every Conceivable Set of Circumstances.

Hmm, so, let's see ... my wife has started acting a little uppity ... no problem, Koran 4:34 implies that I can beat the shit out of her, or at least kick her out of the bedroom until she sees the error of her ways. Koran 2:223 implies that she is my sexual slave and I can have sex with her anywhere and any time I feel like it, whether she wants to or not.

Hey, this is starting to sound good! But my neighbours disagree with my new-found rules on morality. No problem, Koran 5:51 tells me not to take them as my friends, as they are but friends to one another. OK, so maybe I should ignore them? No, I should prepare for them every ambush, smite their necks and their fingertips, and see them brought low (Koran 9:5). Hmm. This is starting to turn into an "Us and Them" scenario, methinks.

So in next to no time our civilisation of brotherly love has degenerated into two opposing sides, one side supports freedom of speech, freedom of expression, equality of everyone before the law, and the concept that everyone is of equal worth as human beings. The other side supports the concept that women are worth less than men, believers are worth more than non-believers, and that believers have the right to kill or enslave non-believers or otherwise discriminate against them.

And I wonder why the inhabitants of Planet Zog seem to have a problem with Koran.doc, which presents itself as the ultimate revelation from God that cannot be questioned or in any way criticised, analysed or rationally and logically de-constructed.

Maybe it is the word of God.

Or maybe it's just bollocks.

Either way, in my view such a document should be questioned, criticised, analysed and rationally and logically de-constructed.

And if that document were questioned, criticised, analysed and rationally and logically de-constructed, then the whole concept would disappear in a puff of smoke.

Which is why, of course, such questioning, criticism, analysis and rational and logical de-construction of Islam is so opposed by Muslims here on Earth.

Anybody out there care to comment?

Catdstrangler101

Thursday 10 July 2008

Muslims Are The New Jews Of Europe

So says Shahid Malik, the International Development Minister and the first Muslim Government Minister in Great Britain. Well, I have news for you, Mr. Malik.

Muslims are NOT the "New Jews." Not by any stretch of the imagination.

The "New Jews" are, amongst others, the indigenous people of Western democracies in Europe, who have welcomed Muslims into their midst over the past forty years, in the naive belief that they would assimilate like any other immigrant group. To help them with this, our political elites have given many of them the advantages of our liberal democracies such as free housing, free education and generous welfare benefits.

But now we see that, like cuckoos in the nest, these very Muslims are taking advantage of the goodwill of the host populations, making demands at every opportunity. In addition, to judge by recent poll results, fully 40 per cent of them would like to replace those same liberal democracies in those host countries with Sharia law. Indeed, if nothing is done, demographics alone suggest that that may be a very real possibility - a profoundly disturbing prospect for all those who care for our hard-won freedoms - although that is a subject for another day.

But the fact remains, Muslims themselves are profoundly anti-Semitic, due in no small part to the teachings of the Islamic texts, which tells Muslims to regard Jews as apes and pigs. This has resulted in a large increase of attacks on Jews by Muslims throughout Europe in recent years.

(Let's not forget, of course, that the spread of Islam over the past 1350 years has resulted in the deaths of at least 270 million non-Muslims around the world, killed by Muslims in the name of Islam. Take a moment out of your day to remember them.)

In short, when considering the sufferings of the Jews, especially those sufferings over the last century when the unspeakable atrocities of the Holocaust were perpetrated, to compare those sufferings with the ridiculous, over-developed sensibilities of the followers of the Religion of the Perpetually Offended - (given the inevitable tendency to violently over-react when someone does something as innocuous as say, looking at your hijab in a funny way) - is nothing short of OBSCENE.

So, Mr. Malik, if you think that prejudice is so terrible, and you don't like it coming in your direction, don't dish it out to others. We have a word for that attitude - hypocrisy. Look it up sometime, why don't you. And while you're at it, why not also look up humility, gratitude, self-reflection and self-criticism. Any dictionary will do. Except perhaps a Muslim dictionary, where those words will most likely be conspicuously absent.

The indefatigable Hugh Fitzgerald has some more on the subject here.

Tuesday 1 July 2008

A Few Thoughts on Tolerance

I have been giving a lot of thought recently to what makes Britain "Such A Great Country To Live In." The quotation marks are not intended as ironic, I really do think that this country is one of the best in the world when it comes to comparative measurement on such mundane parameters as the economy, life expectancy, infant mortality, health, education, poverty, property rights, gender discrimination, religious persecution, human rights, and so on. The same is true, of course, of other Western societies.

But we in Britain are also considered to be at the forefront of enlightened Western societies when it comes to "tolerance." That is to say, we tolerate the characteristics of our fellow men even when those characteristics run contrary to what we perceive as good as far as our own moral compass is concerned. However, in our 21st century enlightened liberal democracy, this could be considered to be a fatal flaw.

Those of you familiar with my previous posts will no doubt see where this is going. Yes, the fatal flaw is that, in striving to be tolerant towards all other points of view, we embrace that which is intolerant towards us and our point of view. Islam - the most intolerant political ideology ever - is on a collision course with Western civilisation, and therefore with our own liberal democracy here in Britain.

Due to its complete incompatibility with aforesaid Western civilisation and our own liberal democracy, there can only be one of two outcomes. Either Islam must be fought to a standstill, and its effects reversed before it is too late, or Islam will overrun and destroy the West, as it has so many civilisations before.

Islam will accept no compromise. Islam will not be stopped - except by crushing, brutal, overwhelming force. There is no reasoning with Islam. There is no bargaining, or negotiating, or compromising with Islam. It will not stop - ever - until it is utterly defeated or until you are dead.

Ayn Rand once said - "You can evade reality. But you cannot evade the consequences of evading reality." So it is with our Western elites. They are attempting to evade reality by permitting the intolerance of Islam to flourish within our western democracies. But the consequence will be either the demise of our western democracies - or a crushing, brutal, overwhelming and bloody suppression of Islam. You only have to look at the history of Lebanon in the 1970's or the history of Bosnia in the 1990's for a picture of how this country will look in 30-40 years time.

Lebanon with a majority Christian population used to be a peaceful country. Beirut, the capital was known as the "Paris of the East". The Christians in Lebanon have now largely been driven out by a belligerent and growing population of Muslims who precipitated a ruinous civil war between 1975 and 1990. Beirut is - even now - still in ruins.

The Christian Serbs in Bosnia woke up too late to the Islamic threat, were not prepared for the slick and professional Muslim PR exercise in victimhood, and were subsequently bombed into submission by our own NATO jets - shame, shame, shame on us, bombing Christian Serbs on behalf of Muslims, all of us duped by Muslim propaganda.

So the bottom line is - we should not tolerate intolerance. Specifically, we should not tolerate the intolerance of Islam. This message should be drummed into the heads of our political elites and the vast majority of freedom loving infidels in this country and in the rest of the Western world until action is taken to stop the rot.

It is not yet too late to stop and reverse Muslim immigration and to take steps to protect our liberal democracy from 7th century barbarism. We still have the power to do so through the ballot box, so I would suggest that you ask your parliamentary representatives what they intend to do about the Islamic menace that threatens our security and our freedoms the next time that you have the opportunity to vote.

Because if you don't, the time after that you may not HAVE the opportunity to vote.

For make no mistake, if nothing is done, demographics alone will ensure the demise of our liberal democracy and its replacement with a totalitarian ideology that cares nothing for individual freedoms. Freedoms, I might add, that were hard-won by our ancestors over the past few hundred years at a great cost of blood and treasure. And if you think I'm exaggerating, look at the history of our great country and the development of our freedoms since the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215 - and then look at how quickly countries like Bosnia and Lebanon - once with peaceful Christian populations - descended into civil war once a growing Muslim population reached critical mass.

When faced with a cancer that will gradually eat away at your body until you succumb - you have two choices. To submit - or to fight back, no matter what the consequences. I know which one I would choose. And so it is with Islam, a cancer on the planet that must be fought to the death.

We must never - ever, ever - submit.